Paragraph formulas compared, thesis engineering, introductions and conclusions, cohesion and flow.
| Formula | Letters | Best for | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEEL | Topic, Evidence, Explanation, Link | Analytical essays (Standard/Advanced) | Mechanical 'L' that just repeats the T |
| PEEL/PEAL | Point, Evidence, Analysis/explain, Link | Same as TEEL; Point should be an argument | Treating P as topic label ("Themes of power") |
| PETAL | Point, Evidence, Technique, Analysis, Link | Forcing technique naming early in training | Technique-t becomes a checklist item |
| IEL/SEA | Idea, Evidence, Analysis (+ so what?) | Sophisticated senior writing | Requires confidence without scaffolding letters |
All formulas are training wheels. Band 6 writing keeps their logic — claim, evidence, effect — while sounding like a person thinking.
A weak topic sentence labels: "Shakespeare uses imagery." A strong one claims: "The play's imagery of disease makes ambition itself seem contagious." Test every topic sentence with two questions:
A thesis is a contestable answer to the question, not a restatement. Build it in three moves:
Keep them short (3–5 sentences): conceptual hook (optional), thesis, roadmap. Never define dictionary terms; never begin "Since the dawn of time". A strong opening move names the tension your essay explores.
No new evidence. Do: restate thesis in evolved form, synthesise the body arguments into one insight, end on significance ("why this text still matters"). One strong final sentence beats three summary ones.
Discursive writing (Standard Module C favourite) wanders deliberately — anecdotes, perspectives, voice — while holding a controlling idea. Reflective writing narrates your own process: situation, choice, evaluation. Both still need cohesion; they trade signposting for voice.
[Topic] The novel indicts not violence but the silence that licenses it. [Evidence+technique] When the crowd "turns, as one body, and looks away," the collective verb transforms omission into choreography. [Analysis] Complicity is shown being performed — guilt as action, not accident — which prepares the reader to judge bystanders as severely as perpetrators later in the narrative. [Deepening evidence] The town's single lamplighter, who "walks his rounds but lights nothing," literalises this economy of withheld action. [Analysis] His futile routine makes negligence visible: even duty performed can be duty betrayed. [Link] Thus the novel's true antagonist is never named on any page — it is the quiet agreement to look away.
🔓 Watch this short ad to unlock your download
30s